Opinion Number. 926

Subject

COMMONWEALTH BANK: COMMONWEALTH IMMUNITY FROM STATE LAWS
WHETHER IMMUNITY OF COMMONWEALTH BANK FROM STATE GOLD-BUYING LICENSING LAWS EXTENDS TO PERSONS SELLING TO BANK

Key Legislation

CONSTITUTION, s. 109

Date
Client
The Secretary to the Treasury

The Secretary to the Treasury forwards the following letter from the Governor of the Commonwealth Bank for advice:

Under date 23 May 1917, the Solicitor-General for the Commonwealth advised that in his opinion the Governor of the Commonwealth Bank need not take out a licence before entering into the business of gold-buying, and in accordance with that opinion we have been carrying on the business of gold-buying in Victoria and Western Australia without taking out a gold dealer's licence from the State.

I now enclose herewith copy of letter from the Under Secretary for Mines, embodying an opinion by the Solicitor-General for Western Australia to the effect that, though the Bank may not be subject to the State laws in regard to obtaining a gold dealer's licence, it would be unlawful for any person to deal with the Bank unless that person were himself a licensed gold dealer.

I shall be glad if you will submit the matter afresh to the Commonwealth Solicitor-General, and advise me his views of the position set out by the Solicitor-General for Western Australia.

The opinion of 23 May 1917(1) was based on the ground that the Commonwealth having empowered the Bank to deal in specie, bullion, gold-dust, etc., the Bank was under no liability to obtain a licence from the State before exercising its powers; otherwise the State could, by refusing a licence, prevent the carrying out of powers within the legislative competence of the Commonwealth.

In my opinion, if the Commonwealth Bank can buy gold without a licence, it is immaterial whether the person from whom the Bank buys the gold has or has not a licence, for any sale to the Bank would be a transaction to which the State law did not apply, and the powers of the State do not extend to imposing restrictions of this nature upon the transaction (D'Emden v. Pedder 1 C.L.R. 91).

[Vol. 16, p. 237]

(1)Opinion No. 795.